Tag Archives: “Tragedy plus time equals comedy”
The idea of “comedy” carries with it a sense of lightness, easy laughter, or distance. It also carries with it the implication that the audience who is listening, watching or reading is primed to laugh. They expect to be entertained and amused, to hear something funny.
When people are in the midst of tragedy, or dealing with its aftermath, their expectations are different. They seek comfort. Connection. Strength. Relief. Information. Laughter can seem inappropriate — especially lighthearted laughter or any sort of mockery. But laughter can also provide comfort, connection, strength, and relief. And sometimes humor — as opposed to comedy or a joke — can also provide information, or a new perspective that enables coping. In other words, humor can allow us to stand a little askew — a stance that can help in surviving a tragedy, or in coping afterward. This use of humor is very human, but I also think, in many ways, it is particularly American.
In September 1857, the ship Central America, carrying 626 crew and passengers and almost $2,000,000 in treasure, went down in a hurricane off the southeastern coast of the United States. Sighting a ship in the distance, all of the women and children were put aboard the only three lifeboats they had. The men aboard went grimly about the business of bailing until the ship finally went down. Of the approximately 576 men cast into the waters when the ship went down, fewer than 10% survived to be rescued. But amid the terror of the wreck, a group of survivors remembered most what gave them hope and strength: humor.
One of the passengers on board the ship was the blackface minstrel Billy Birch. Along with other men, he had put his wife Virgina (with her pet canary firmly and safely tucked into the bosom of her dress) into a lifeboat. Cast into the sea with the others when the ship went down, Birch swam about until he found a bit of flotsam. Hailing other survivors in the nearby waters, he invited them expansively to have a perch on his “yacht” to rest, and apparently kept up a running patter of jokes and humorous comments as they waited hours in the cold and stormy seas for rescue. Years later, long after the stories of the night’s terror had dimmed in the popular imagination, occasional re-tellings surfaced about the incongruity of the famous actor and his impromptu floating stage, of his indefatigable good humor and laughter.
The story resonated because it appealed to something deep within Americans’ sense of themselves. Unlike the legendary British “stiff upper lip,” Americans seem to pride themselves on meeting disaster and danger with resolve and quips and humor. Events of the last week show that this is still true.
When on April 15, the Boston Marathon was violently disrupted by bombs exploding near the finish line, the initial response across the nation was of course shock, empathy, sadness, and anger — simultaneous with pride in those who helped and in the resilience of survivors who woke up “happy to be alive” and runners who had not been able to finish the race but who, only a day or two later, were discussing online how to finish the race in honor of the fallen, which included an 8-year-old boy, and out of determination not to be stopped. Humor quickly came into the national conversation as well, as one of the slain, Krystle Campbell, was described over and over as having “a great sense of humor” as one of her most important and defining characteristics.
Stephen Colbert weighed in the next evening, with a tribute to the people of Boston in his opening monologue that is being shared on websites and in news reports around the world. The monologue has already been characterized as “masterful,” “meaningful,” “eloquent,” “touching,” “patriotic,” “moving” — and “humorous.” I would argue that it is also quintessentially American. Continue reading →